old media big time fail
This morning was Christchurch's turn. A little like Newcastle it's a city that didn't consider itself much of a quake risk, so when a walloping 7.1 hit in the early hours of the morning many of the 300,000 residents were caught by surprise.
Despite the many earthquake-unfriendly brick and stone buildings in the city that resulted in widespread property damage, to date only two serious casualties have been reported. The aforementioned Newcastle shake, a measly 5.3, killed 13 and injured over 100. Haiti earlier this year was a comparable 7.0 and clocked up 230,000 dead, 300,000 injured and 1,000,000 made homeless. The toll in Christchurch is a testament to stringent building regulations in New Zealand, though a small population and it happening while most people were tucked up in bed certainly helped.
Across the ditch in Australia, New Zealand's closest neighbour, it took 7.5 hours for The Age to report the quake. Maybe the cub reporter on the night desk was snoozing? But the delay in the reporting is made all the more extraordinary by Fairfax owning half of the newspapers in New Zealand. The Australian did little better breaking the news ahead of The Age only 40 minutes earlier.
Citizen journalism however is alive and well. The #eqnz stream on Twitter has spewed out thousands of updates from locals on the ground and international well-wishers. There's been a rich source of photos (my favourite to date being Redbox's on Flickr) and blog posts as well as to updates in the kiwi media and official channels such as civil defense.
It's times like this I'm grateful to not be reliant on old media. As a previous defender of print journalism I'm beginning to agree that they've had their day. Why bother having an online presence if they are unable to tap into the immediacy of new media? There are no excuses for such abysmal tardiness.
Or does the average Australian journalist think that kiwis don't matter?
From The Press